Business & Systems
Operational, organizational, strategic, workflow, technology, product, process, bottleneck, and cross-functional problems.
Bring me one messy business, property, organizational, operational, or systems problem. In a focused 60 to 90 minute session, I will help you work through the competing explanations, find what does not fit, and identify what deserves attention next.
$495. One problem. One focused session. One concise written assessment.
Not sure whether your problem fits? Tell me about it first. I’ll tell you whether I think this diagnostic is an appropriate next step before you spend anything.
You do not need to choose a category. The general Diagnostic remains complete and directly purchasable. These paths simply help you recognize the kind of problem you are bringing.
Operational, organizational, strategic, workflow, technology, product, process, bottleneck, and cross-functional problems.
For businesses, projects, assets, or organizations where the question is what can be saved, what should be fixed, what should be stopped, and what must happen first.
For property cash flow, debt, occupancy, capital needs, operations, refinance, sell, or hold decisions, and turnaround situations.
For healthcare business, workflow, technology, staffing, organizational, and systems problems. This is not medical diagnosis or treatment.
AI adoption, agents, automation, implementation, workflow, product, strategy, and situations where it is unclear whether the problem is technical, operational, commercial, or organizational.
Boards, ownership, authority, accountability, incentives, partnerships, leadership, decision rights, and situations where individually rational decisions are producing a bad overall result.
Medical record review, clinical plausibility, expert analysis, healthcare disputes, professional-standard questions, and related medicolegal work use a separate qualification path.
These are separate engagements. The $495 Diagnostic is the broad first engagement when the real problem is unclear; it is not a required step before a defined review or build.
If the question spans people, operations, money, technology or judgment, start with the $495 Rapid Systems Integrity Diagnostic.
If the question is whether a specific AI workflow reliably performs its intended job, the $7,500 AI Workflow Evidence Review examines agreed sources, cases and acceptance criteria.
Go to Right Engines for workflow evidence. Read the existing review scope here.
If the next step is building, fixing or custom implementation, agree a separate scope with Machine Over Human.
A review is not certification or a promised outcome. Medical evidence and related matters use the separate Medico-Legal path.
You bring me the problem, the competing explanations, and the facts you think matter. I will ask questions, test assumptions, look for contradictions and hidden dependencies, and try to identify the point where the problem is actually being created or sustained.
After the session, I will send you a concise written assessment covering:
Before the 60 to 90 minute session, you will complete a structured intake and may provide up to five key supporting items. The purpose is to help me understand the background before we meet so the live session can focus on the actual problem rather than basic fact gathering.
Don’t worry about knowing exactly what to send. Start with the facts you have. I’ll guide you.
You do not need to diagnose your own problem before meeting me. The intake is designed to help me understand the situation even if you are not sure what matters yet.
P&L, cash-flow summary, KPI report, budget, or another relevant financial or operating snapshot.
A short chronology of what happened, what changed, and when the problem became apparent.
An org chart, workflow, process map, responsibility matrix, lease or debt summary, or similar system overview.
Reports, performance data, complaint summaries, relevant email summaries, missed targets, operating reports, or other evidence of what is going wrong.
Consultant reports, management recommendations, lender proposals, contractor estimates, internal memos, or other material showing what different people think should happen.
If you do not have all five, that is fine. Send what you have. Do not delay trying to create perfect information.
Do not send confidential legal files, medical records, protected health information, passwords, card data, or other highly sensitive material through the initial intake.
If material beyond this bounded review is needed, I may ask for one or two additional items later or recommend a larger engagement.
My working life has repeatedly put me in situations where the important question was not “Who is the specialist?” but “What is actually happening?”
Emergency medicine trained me to make decisions with incomplete information, competing explanations, time pressure, and real consequences. I now apply the same discipline to difficult problems across business, commercial real estate, organizations, AI, workflows, and systems.
If several smart people are looking at different parts of the same problem and nobody is making the whole thing make sense, that is probably where I am most useful.
Read more about my background and how I work.
See completed work or browse Difficult Problems for public examples of the method.
One-time fixed fee
Not sure whether your problem fits? Tell me about it first. I’ll tell you whether I think this diagnostic is an appropriate next step before you spend anything.
Larger implementation or advisory work is separate. You are not committing to anything beyond this diagnostic.
If you are unsure, discuss the problem first.
This is a fixed-scope problem-solving and advisory engagement. It is not medical treatment or legal representation, does not create a physician-patient or attorney-client relationship, and does not guarantee a particular outcome.
Do not submit medical records, confidential legal files, passwords, card data, or highly sensitive material through the initial purchase or intake flow.
Bring me one difficult problem. I will help you determine what deserves attention next.
Not sure whether your problem fits? Tell me about it first. I’ll tell you whether I think this diagnostic is an appropriate next step before you spend anything.